Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(42): e31289, 2022 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2087901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of vitamin A as an adjuvant therapy for pneumonia in children. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Database and Chongqing VIP information network from libraries building to March 2022, screening randomized controlled trials (RCT) about vitamin A combined with conventional therapy for pneumonia in children. Two researchers used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the quality of included studies dependently. Data analysis was conducted in the RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: 15 trials involving 3496 patients (treated group: 1898; control group: 1598) were analyzed in this study. The Meta-analysis showed that vitamin A combined with conventional therapy improved clinical efficacy (P < .05), shortened the duration of fever and cough, negative time of chest X-ray, and the hospitalization, lung rale disappearance, choking milk disappearance, shortness of breath disappearance and perilabial cyanosis disappearance (P < .05). However, vitamin A combined with conventional therapy did not reduce the mortality of pneumonia in children (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Vitamin A contributes to relieve the clinical symptoms and signs, and also shorten the hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Child , Humans , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Cough , Fever
2.
East Mediterr Health J ; 28(9): 673-681, 2022 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067577

ABSTRACT

Background: Incomplete data are often presented for determining the role of vitamin A supplement therapy for improving treatment outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Aims: We compared treatment effects between a group that received vitamin A added to the standard COVID-19 treatment and another group that received the standard drug treatment alone. Methods: Participants in this triple-blind controlled trial comprised 182 COVID-19 outpatients in Saveh City, Markazi Province, Islamic Republic of Iran, in 2020. Patients were randomly divided into experimental (n = 91) and control (n = 91) groups. Patients in the control group received the national standard treatment for COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine), and those in the intervention group received 25 000 IU/d oral vitamin A for 10 days in addition to the standard treatment recommended by the national protocol. We evaluated the clinical symptoms, paraclinical criteria, and hospitalization status before and after 10 days of interventions. Results: The treatment groups did not differ significantly in clinical and paraclinical symptoms before the intervention. However, clinical symptoms such as fever, body ache, weakness and fatigue, paraclinical symptoms, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein showed significantly greater decreases in the experimental group 10 days post-intervention compared with the standard treatment alone (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Vitamin A supplementation demonstrated efficacy in improving some clinical and paraclinical symptoms in patients with COVID-19. Future studies should evaluate vitamin A supplementation with a larger sample size and compare different dosages, especially in hospitalized patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , C-Reactive Protein , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin A/therapeutic use
3.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266495, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1785197

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vitamin A Supplementation (VAS) is a cost-effective intervention to decrease mortality associated with measles and diarrheal diseases among children aged 6-59 months in low-income countries. Recently, experts have suggested that other interventions like large-scale food fortification and increasing the coverage of measles vaccination might provide greater impact than VAS. In this study, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of a VAS scale-up in three sub-Saharan African countries. METHODS: We developed an individual-based microsimulation using the Vivarium simulation framework to estimate the cost and effect of scaling up VAS from 2019 to 2023 in Nigeria, Kenya, and Burkina Faso, three countries with different levels of baseline coverage. We calibrated the model with disease and risk factor estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 (GBD 2019). We obtained baseline coverage, intervention effects, and costs from a systematic review. After the model was validated against GBD inputs, we modeled an alternative scenario where we scaled-up VAS coverage from 2019 to a level that halved the exposure to lack of VAS in 2023. Based on the simulation outputs for DALYs averted and intervention cost, we determined estimates for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in USD/DALY. FINDINGS: Our estimates for ICER are as follows: $860/DALY [95% UI; 320, 3530] in Nigeria, $550/DALY [240, 2230] in Kenya, and $220/DALY [80, 2470] in Burkina Faso. Examining the data for DALYs averted for the three countries over the time span, we found that the scale-up led to 21 [5, 56] DALYs averted per 100,000 person-years in Nigeria, 21 [5, 47] DALYs averted per 100,000 person-years in Kenya, and 14 [0, 37] DALYs averted per 100,000 person-years in Burkina Faso. CONCLUSIONS: VAS may no longer be as cost-effective in low-income regions as it has been previously. Updated estimates in GBD 2019 for the effect of Vitamin A Deficiency on causes of death are an additional driver of this lower estimate of cost-effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Global Burden of Disease , Measles , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Kenya , Vitamin A/therapeutic use
4.
Drug Dev Res ; 82(7): 883-895, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1168846

ABSTRACT

The current pandemic forced us to introspect and revisit our armamentarium of medicinal agents which could be life-saving in emergency situations. Oxygen diffusion-enhancing compounds represent one such class of potential therapeutic agents, particularly in ischemic conditions. As rewarding as the name suggests, these agents, represented by the most advanced and first-in-class molecule, trans-sodium crocetinate (TSC), are the subject of intense clinical investigation, including Phase 1b/2b clinical trials for COVID-19. Being a successor of a natural product, crocetin, TSC is being investigated for various cancers as a radiosensitizer owing to its oxygen diffusion enhancement capability. The unique properties of TSC make it a promising therapeutic agent for various ailments such as hemorrhagic shock, stroke, heart attack, among others. The present review outlines various (bio)synthetic strategies, pharmacological aspects, clinical overview and potential therapeutic benefits of crocetin and related compounds including TSC. The recent literature focusing on the delivery aspects of these compounds is covered as well to paint the complete picture to the curious reader. Given the potential TSC holds as a first-in-class agent, small- and/or macromolecular therapeutics based on the core concept of improved oxygen diffusion from blood to the surrounding tissues where it is needed the most, will be developed in future and satisfy the unmet medical need for many diseases and disorders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Carotenoids/therapeutic use , Oxygen Consumption/drug effects , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Vitamin A/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Carotenoids/chemical synthesis , Carotenoids/pharmacology , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Diffusion , Humans , Vitamin A/chemical synthesis , Vitamin A/pharmacology , Vitamin A/therapeutic use
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 147(5): 1704-1719, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1096022

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract viruses are the second most common cause of olfactory dysfunction. As we learn more about the effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the recognition that olfactory dysfunction is a key symptom of this disease process, there is a greater need than ever for evidence-based management of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to provide an evidence-based practical guide to the management of PIOD (including post-coronavirus 2019 cases) for both primary care practitioners and hospital specialists. METHODS: A systematic review of the treatment options available for the management of PIOD was performed. The written systematic review was then circulated among the members of the Clinical Olfactory Working Group for their perusal before roundtable expert discussion of the treatment options. The group also undertook a survey to determine their current clinical practice with regard to treatment of PIOD. RESULTS: The search resulted in 467 citations, of which 107 articles were fully reviewed and analyzed for eligibility; 40 citations fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were randomized controlled trials. In total, 15 of the articles specifically looked at PIOD whereas the other 25 included other etiologies for olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The Clinical Olfactory Working Group members made an overwhelming recommendation for olfactory training; none recommended monocycline antibiotics. The diagnostic role of oral steroids was discussed; some group members were in favor of vitamin A drops. Further research is needed to confirm the place of other therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Steroids/therapeutic use , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Consensus , Evidence-Based Medicine , Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(2)2021 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1090980

ABSTRACT

A 34year-old man presented with diminution of vision, pain and whitish opacity in both eyes (right eye followed by left eye) since 1 week. He is a known case of chronic alcoholic abuse. He had multiple episodes of haemoptysis in the past. On general physical examination, he was severely malnourished with multiple oral ulcers. Visual acuity at presentation was light perception in both eyes with projection of rays accurate in all quadrants. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy revealed bilateral total corneal melt with diffuse conjunctival congestion. Corneal scrapings and blood investigations were done and he was started on empirical topical and systemic therapy followed by surgical intervention, with large corneal grafts in both the eyes (right eye followed by left eye) with 1 day interval. The visual gain in both the eyes were 20/400 at first postoperative day. The right eye developed severe fibrinous reaction on the second postoperative day which resolved with topical antibiotics, topical steroids and systemic steroids. The patient was followed up via telemedicine (due to COVID-19 outbreak) and he is able to carry out his daily routine work independently.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/complications , Corneal Ulcer/etiology , Protein-Energy Malnutrition/complications , Vitamin A Deficiency/complications , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Avitaminosis/diagnosis , Avitaminosis/drug therapy , Corneal Transplantation , Corneal Ulcer/pathology , Corneal Ulcer/therapy , Early Medical Intervention , Humans , Male , Necrosis , Slit Lamp Microscopy , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Vitamin A Deficiency/diagnosis , Vitamin A Deficiency/drug therapy , Vitamins/therapeutic use
7.
Br J Nutr ; 126(11): 1663-1672, 2021 12 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1065740

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV2 infects respiratory epithelial cells via its cellular receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, causing a viral pneumonia with pronounced inflammation resulting in significant damage to the lungs and other organ systems, including the kidneys, though symptoms and disease severity are quite variable depending on the intensity of exposure and presence of underlying conditions that may affect the immune response. The resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can cause multi-organ system dysfunction in patients requiring hospitalisation and intensive care treatment. Serious infections like COVID-19 often negatively affect nutritional status, and the resulting nutritional deficiencies may increase disease severity and impair recovery. One example is the viral infection measles, where associated vitamin A (VA) deficiency increases disease severity and appropriately timed supplementation during recovery reduces mortality and hastens recovery. VA may play a similar role in COVID-19. First, VA is important in maintaining innate and adaptive immunity to promote clearance of a primary infection as well as minimise risks from secondary infections. Second, VA plays a unique role in the respiratory tract, minimising damaging inflammation, supporting repair of respiratory epithelium and preventing fibrosis. Third, VA deficiency may develop during COVID-19 due to specific effects on lung and liver stores caused by inflammation and impaired kidney function, suggesting that supplements may be needed to restore adequate status. Fourth, VA supplementation may counteract adverse effects of SARS-CoV2 on the angiotensin system as well as minimises adverse effects of some COVID-19 therapies. Evaluating interactions of SARS-CoV2 infection with VA metabolism may thus provide improved COVID-19 therapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammation/therapy , Vitamin A , Adaptive Immunity , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Inflammation/prevention & control , RNA, Viral , Vitamin A/therapeutic use
8.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 32(10): 2115-2131, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-738008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, a novel human-infecting coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, had emerged. The WHO has classified the epidemic as a "public health emergency of international concern". A dramatic situation has unfolded with thousands of deaths, occurring mainly in the aged and very ill people. Epidemiological studies suggest that immune system function is impaired in elderly individuals and these subjects often present a deficiency in fat-soluble and hydrosoluble vitamins. METHODS: We searched for reviews describing the characteristics of autoimmune diseases and the available therapeutic protocols for their treatment. We set them as a paradigm with the purpose to uncover common pathogenetic mechanisms between these pathological conditions and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we searched for studies describing the possible efficacy of vitamins A, D, E, and C in improving the immune system function. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 infection induces strong immune system dysfunction characterized by the development of an intense proinflammatory response in the host, and the development of a life-threatening condition defined as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This leads to acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS), mainly in aged people. High mortality and lethality rates have been observed in elderly subjects with CoV-2-related infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamins may shift the proinflammatory Th17-mediated immune response arising in autoimmune diseases towards a T-cell regulatory phenotype. This review discusses the possible activity of vitamins A, D, E, and C in restoring normal antiviral immune system function and the potential therapeutic role of these micronutrients as part of a therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/diet therapy , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytokines/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diet therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Vitamins/immunology , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Aged , Ascorbic Acid/immunology , Ascorbic Acid/pharmacology , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Th17 Cells/drug effects , Th17 Cells/immunology , Vitamin A/immunology , Vitamin A/pharmacology , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/immunology , Vitamin D/pharmacology , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamin E/immunology , Vitamin E/pharmacology , Vitamin E/therapeutic use , Vitamins/pharmacology
9.
Nutrients ; 12(9)2020 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-727436

ABSTRACT

There are limited proven therapeutic options for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. The role of vitamin and mineral supplementation or "immunonutrition" has previously been explored in a number of clinical trials in intensive care settings, and there are several hypotheses to support their routine use. The aim of this narrative review was to investigate whether vitamin supplementation is beneficial in COVID-19. A systematic search strategy with a narrative literature summary was designed, using the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trial Registry, and Nexis media databases. The immune-mediating, antioxidant and antimicrobial roles of vitamins A to E were explored and their potential role in the fight against COVID-19 was evaluated. The major topics extracted for narrative synthesis were physiological and immunological roles of each vitamin, their role in respiratory infections, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and COVID-19. Vitamins A to E highlighted potentially beneficial roles in the fight against COVID-19 via antioxidant effects, immunomodulation, enhancing natural barriers, and local paracrine signaling. Level 1 and 2 evidence supports the use of thiamine, vitamin C, and vitamin D in COVID-like respiratory diseases, ARDS, and sepsis. Although there are currently no published clinical trials due to the novelty of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is pathophysiologic rationale for exploring the use of vitamins in this global pandemic, supported by early anecdotal reports from international groups. The final outcomes of ongoing trials of vitamin supplementation are awaited with interest.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Dietary Supplements , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Thiamine/therapeutic use , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamin E/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
10.
Aging (Albany NY) ; 12(15): 15784-15796, 2020 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-721666

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an epidemic disease characterized by rapid infection and a high death toll. The clinical diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 has risen sharply, especially in Western countries. Globally, an effective treatment for COVID-19 is still limited. Vitamin A (VA) exhibits pharmacological activity in the management of pneumonia. Thus, we reason that VA may potentially serve as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 regimen. In this study, bioinformatics analysis and computation assays using a network pharmacology method were conducted to explore and uncover the therapeutic targets and mechanisms of VA for treating COVID-19. We identified candidate targets, pharmacological functions, and therapeutic pathways of VA against SARS-CoV-2. Bioinformatics findings indicate that the mechanisms of action of VA against SARS-CoV-2 include enrichment of immunoreaction, inhibition of inflammatory reaction, and biological processes related to reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, seven core targets of VA against COVID-19, including MAPK1, IL10, EGFR, ICAM1, MAPK14, CAT, and PRKCB were identified. With this bioinformatics-based report, we reveal, for the first time, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 functions and mechanisms of VA and suggest that VA may act as a potent treatment option for COVID-19, a deadly global epidemic.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Immunity/drug effects , Inflammation , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Vitamin A , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/physiology , Biological Availability , COVID-19 , Computational Biology/methods , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Gene Ontology , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/etiology , Inflammation/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , SARS-CoV-2 , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Vitamin A/pharmacokinetics , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Vitamins/pharmacokinetics , Vitamins/therapeutic use
11.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 38(2): 69-77, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610528

ABSTRACT

During the initial pandemic wave of COVID-19, apart from common presenting symptoms (cough, fever, and fatigue), many countries have reported a sudden increase in the number of smell and taste dysfunction patients. Smell dysfunction has been reported in other viral infections (parainfluenza, rhinovirus, SARS, and others), but the incidence is much lower than SARS-CoV-2 infection. The pathophysiology of post-infectious olfactory loss was hypothesized that viruses may produce an inflammatory reaction of the nasal mucosa or damage the olfactory neuroepithelium directly. However, loss of smell could be presented in COVID-19 patients without other rhinologic symptoms or significant nasal inflammation. This review aims to provide a brief overview of recent evidence for epidemiology, pathological mechanisms for the smell, and taste dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Furthermore, prognosis and treatments are reviewed with scanty evidence. We also discuss the possibility of using "smell and taste loss" as a screening tool for COVID-19 and treatment options in the post-SARS-CoV-2 infectious olfactory loss.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/physiopathology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Incidence , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy , Olfactory Mucosa/drug effects , Olfactory Mucosa/physiopathology , Olfactory Mucosa/virology , Olfactory Perception/drug effects , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Remission, Spontaneous , SARS-CoV-2 , Taste Perception/drug effects , Vitamin A/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL